Philips Recalls
A hospital operating room with medical equipment (representative file photo). Specific recalled device: see recall details below. Photo: FDA / Public Domain.
- Recalls in database
- 19
- Agency
- FDA
- Years covered
- 2026
- Primary hazards
- Medical Device Defects (19)
This hub covers 1 recall event involving Philips North America, published by the FDA as 19 product-line records, 2026–2026. The FDA issues one record per affected product line, so a single medical-device recall can appear as many records.
Each row links to the FDA enforcement record with the classification and the firm's corrective action.
How this hub is built. This page collects 1 recall event tied to Philips (across 19 product-line records) in the current 411 Press recall dataset. A note on counting. The three agencies package recalls differently. NHTSA issues one record per safety campaign; the CPSC issues one per recall; the FDA issues one per affected product line, so a single FDA recall can appear as dozens of records. Counting raw records would push FDA-heavy brands artificially to the top. The counts here are recall EVENTS — distinct agency events — with the FDA product-line record total shown alongside wherever the two differ. Records are grouped by a normalized version of the recalling firm's name (normalizer version 2026-07-28.C3.2). Parent, subsidiary, and "doing business as" relationships are not merged unless the agency data states them, so a corporate family can appear under more than one name. Regulator for these records: FDA. They were published 2026–2026. An event count reflects how much recall activity fell inside the current dataset — not a ranking of relative safety. Larger manufacturers and higher-volume product lines generate more recall activity. This is the current dataset, not an all-time total, and it grows as new notices are ingested. Every row links to the original agency notice.
2026 (19)
- Class II
Philips Upgrade to MR 7700 with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips SmartPath to Ingenia Elition X with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips SmartPath to dStream for XR and 3.0T with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips SmartPath to dStream for 3.0T with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips SmartPath to dStream for 1.5T with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips MR 7700 with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Ingenia Elition X with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Ingenia Elition S with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Ingenia Ambition X with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Ingenia Ambition S with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Ingenia 3.0T CX with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Ingenia 3.0T with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Ingenia 1.5T CX with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Ingenia 1.5T with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Evolution upgrade 3.0T with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Evolution Upgrade 1.5T with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Achieva 3.0T with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Achieva 1.5T Initial system with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.
- Class II
Philips Achieva 1.5T with MR Elastography (MRE)
The potential for stiffness value errors when a specific range of image reconstruction parameters is used in combination with Resoundant's algorithm, leading to the reconstruction voxel size settings in the default MRE scan protocol displaying too small.